A41 · Reference edition 2026.11

Component stacks — Definition and boundaries

A stack record needs an ordered sequence from the base to the part contact. Component IDs alone do not establish assembled height.

Scope and purpose

Start by separating the named concept from adjacent concepts. Use the observation below to identify the question the record is intended to answer. Read the caution before applying the example. A definition is useful only when another reader can tell what falls outside it.

Working notes

This reference collection concerns light, offline dimensional-inspection layouts. It brings locating concepts, component descriptions and revision records together without substituting for an engineered fixture design. The drawings are original explanatory diagrams. Reference IDs identify documents, not commercially tested products. Read the scope and limitations alongside each example, and keep the actual part drawing and inspection requirements available when reviewing a proposed layout.

Component stacks — Illustrative reference; not a tested product or a certification.
Component stacks. Illustrative reference; not a tested product or a certification.

Practical example

List base interface, riser, support body and contact cap as separate rows.

Reference recordInterpretation
A41Component stacks
Scope and purposeA stack record needs an ordered sequence from the base to the part contact. Component IDs alone do not establish assembled height.
Limits and interpretationDo not sum nominal catalogue heights into an unsupported tolerance claim.

Review checklist

Write a one-sentence scope statement; identify a neighbouring concept; record what the example does not establish.

Limits and interpretation

Do not sum nominal catalogue heights into an unsupported tolerance claim. Measurements and examples are descriptive, not acceptance criteria.

Related reading

Component stacks →