VELTRIQReference edition 2026.11
Reference material

Methods

A technical library for the geometry, documentation and review of modular inspection fixtures.

Definition and boundaries

Start by separating the named concept from adjacent concepts. Use the observation below to identify the question the record is intended to answer. Read the caution before applying the example. A definition is useful only when another reader can tell what falls outside it.

Write a one-sentence scope statement; identify a neighbouring concept; record what the example does not establish.

Layout and sequence

Place the relevant elements in a visible order before completing the record. A diagram should distinguish position from sequence and should preserve the orientation used in the written notes. Review the example for a practical way to make the relationship explicit.

Identify the starting condition; mark the order or orientation; check that labels in the figure match the accompanying table.

Comparison and alternatives

Compare alternatives using the same question and context. A difference in wording, layout or scale is not automatically a difference in performance. Keep the original observations available and explain which differences are meaningful for this comparison.

State the comparison question; align context and labels; list common features separately from differences; leave unsupported conclusions open.

Recording and revision

A reference record should allow another reader to reconstruct the intended description. Keep the identifier, context and revision together. When information changes, explain the change and retain enough of the earlier description to understand what was superseded.

Check the identifier; describe the observation and its source; date the revision; link affected figures; distinguish confirmed facts from open questions.

Review and interpretation

Review the record before drawing a conclusion. Look for missing context, ambiguous labels and claims that exceed the evidence. The purpose is to identify what can be understood from the record and what still requires a separate assessment.

Read the record without relying on memory; check every label; identify uncertainty; decide whether a specialist review is required; retain the original observation.